Powered by BlogHarbor
Powered by BlogHarbor
Recent Visitors
pdguymikeg - Thu 03 Apr 2008 03:17 PM EDT 
Michael - Fri 29 Feb 2008 11:12 AM EST 
Mark Sofman - Fri 26 Oct 2007 08:55 AM EDT 
melindasigal - Tue 04 Sep 2007 11:27 AM EDT 
Rob - Tue 14 Aug 2007 06:51 PM EDT 
View Article  The Communicator as Advocate
In this edition, the role of "communicator as advocate" gets discussed in a mock interview...with myself, comparing the advocate's perspective with the orientations of those communicators who see themselves as "journalists", "marketeers", and "facilitators".   more »
View Article  Pragmatic Measurement (Or how a Monkey became my second favorite animal)
A brief overview on how to quickly and cheaply use an online qualitative research tool to yield hard data as well as valuable insights   more »
View Article  As the Levees Break: What Kind of IABC Will Emerge From New Orleans?
As IABC convenes in New Orleans, an analogy of a city laid low by hurricane and an association reeling from potent and rising electronic competition rings true. Will IABC seek higher ground--or will its management try to defend an indefensible position?   more »
View Article  MyRagan.Com: The Winner Takes It All
Congratulations to Mark Ragan for launching MyRagan.Com...and potentially rocking IABC's and Melcrum's worlds in the process   more »
View Article  In Case You Were Wondering...
Wifi and job interviews prompt an unanticipated break for CommsOffensive325--will be back on the 25th.   more »
View Article  Bringing It Inside The Wall: Time for Internal Communicators to Rethink "External" Communication?
First thoughts on a big question--is it time for internal communicators to think about treating what is considered "external communication" as an internal communications responsibility?   more »
View Article  Does Internal Communications Need a Culture Change?
Following the exchange with Steve Crescenzo last month on the extent to which internal communicators can change culture, CommsOffensive325 raises a question for internal communicators--is it time to change our own culture?   more »
View Article  An Open Letter to Steve Crescenzo
CommsOffensive325 challenges internal comms industry "rock star" Steve Crescenzo on the viability of international culture change   more »
View Article  If Internal Communication was a Sport, What Sport Would it Be?
Another challenge to the supposition that internal communication is some form of "PR"--and a look at how internal comms resembles one of the world's most intriguing sports   more »
View Article  From "Competent" to "Champion"--Is it Time to Aim Higher?
In this edition, CommsOffensive325 challenges the notion of "core competencies" as a standard for internal communicators--and suggests some characteristics for real "champions" in the field   more »
View Article  TD and DeDe Osfa

Exclusive Interview with:

The World’s Two Most Influential Internal Communication Advisors

 

Their names are largely unknown among internal communicators, and they have been interviewed neither by Ragan, Melcrum, or even IABC’s own Communications World.  But their influence over the internal communication industry has been nothing short of overarching.

 

From a well-appointed yacht in international waters in the Adriatic Sea, CommsOffensive325 brings you an exclusive interview with T.D. Osfa and DeDe Osfa.  T.D. and DeDe are fellows at the “CASCADE” institute in Monte Carlo, and inventors of the world’s leading presentation software, “PpT”.

 

325: So, let me get this straight.  No one in the internal comms profession has heard of you, and you’ve never collected a consulting fee, but you are said to be by far the most powerful internal communication advisor in the world.  Explain:

 

TD Osfa: What is the point of talking to communications people?  We—DeDe and I, have the ear of the bosses, the CEOs, the managers of the world.  They’re the ones who tell you lot what to do.  And about the fees?  We invented PpT and developed the most popular internal communications technique in the world—named after our little institute, the “CASCADE”. Who needs fees?

 

DeDe Osfa:  We live off the royalties!  Ha!

 

TD Osfa:  Our time honored and much loved approaches are named after us:  Top-Down-One-Size-Fits-All (TD OSFA) and Dumbed-Down-One-Size-Fits-All (DD OSFA).  They are loved because they make sense to the people who matter—the people who employ your readers!

 

325: Why do you think your approach is so popular? 

 

TD Osfa: My approach is simpler than my sweetie-darling’s.  It’s based on one very simple principle—that people are lucky to have jobs at all, and that if they don’t do what they are told, they will lose them.  So, when someone following my approach says “This what is so, this is when it will be so, and if you don’t like it, that’s your problem and not mine”, the message moves down the line, from manager to manager to staff, with no ambiguity and minimum pushback. 

 

Managers and bosses like this approach—not only is it direct, it reminds people who’s boss. 

 

325: But don’t people deserve an explanation from time to time?

 

TD Osfa: When managers feel a need to explain things, that’s when they get into trouble.  So that’s why my sweetie came up with her approach, come here darling…

 

DeDe Osfa:  Oh, you brilliant man.  You ask me about my approach?  It’s also very sweet and very simple.  If you are going to give any explanation, make sure that the staff member of the most limited intelligence and experience can understand it, and don’t add ANYTHING more.  That way, everyone gets the same story.  Isn’t that fair?

 

TD Osfa: Yes, it’s fair!  And we know organizations are fair, don’t we?

 

325: So, why have you surfaced to give an interview to CommsOffensive325?

 

TD Osfa:  Because we find you very challenging.

 

DeDe Osfa: We always like a good challenge, and you communications types could benefit from being a bit more challenging.  Of course, you have your work cut out for you.  Our thinking has driven management approaches to communication for many years.  Top-down-one-size-fits-all makes a lot of sense to these people. 

 

325: Why do you think it makes so much sense to managers?

 

TD Osfa: Managers are trained to measure, streamline, and reduce—so some of your fancy targeted communication approaches are just too much for them.  They’d rather see everything go into one vehicle, and they really don’t give a damn if anyone reads it (particularly when their staff know that anything important will be told them by their manager).  Proposing lots of little vehicles or creative approaches doesn’t impress managers, especially when there’s real work to be done.  Our approach, on the other hand, makes a lot of sense—particularly since it reinforces their authority and the authority of senior management.

 

325: But what if people are talking with each other on the job—and not just simply parroting the company line?

 

DeDe Osfa: Shouldn’t those people be fired?

 

TD Osfa: Maybe in the long term, but in the short term, firing everyone would have an impact on productivity and morale!  It always makes more sense to fire a couple at a time, and then see if morale improves.  Public hangings, especially in my country, have always been an effective form of communication!

 

325:  That’s the first time you speak of morale.  Do you see a correlation between poor communication and poor morale?

 

TD Osfa:  An excellent question—very clever.  There may be a correlation, but not necessarily a cause.  But the companies that follow my approach also tend to spend a lot of time communicating about good news and happy people in the tools they use to communicate.  I’m not sure it makes any difference—in fact I think it gets in the way of the real message: “This what is so, this is when it will be so, and if you don’t like it, that’s your problem and not mine.”  On the one hand, it makes the management feel better about itself by distributing happy news, but on the other it can create expectations and desires for broader communication that may not be healthy.

 

DeDe Osfa:  My brilliant husband restrains himself.  If you communicate more than the basics, you create space for questioning.  When you create space for questioning, you create room for people to start to doubt who the boss really is.  Some people think it’s the customer, some think it’s the “stakeholders” and some think it’s the staff itself!  Whether it’s a few innocuous posters of staff members’ children at a local fair, or whether it’s a full blown “engagement” program, the doors are opening towards dangerous thinking and subversive activity.

 

325: I see you have very strong opinions.  On another topic:  What does “CASCADE” stand for?

 

TD Osfa: It stands for our approach to organizational communication.  CASCADE is a top-down flow that occurs frequently in nature, dispersing its nourishing and healing waters to the plants and animals below.  CASCADEs are beneficial, and reflect the natural order of power and productivity that exists in the world.

 

DeDe Osfa: And what in nature flows from the bottom-up?  Volcanos, and vomit!  One is destructive, the other disgusting. 

 

325: But what do the letters stand for?

 

DeDe Osfa: The letters stand for the:

 

Centre for the

Asphyxiation and

Suffocation of

Creativity

And

Dialogue in

Enterprises.

 

TD Osfa: No, you can’t print that---that’s TOP SECRET! That’s it, give me your recorder…..

 

325: I was lucky to have the world’s first waterproof BlackBerry.  I leapt off the yacht, started swimming towards Tirana, knowing that while what I’d seen would be hard for most communicators to believe, what I had heard was all too familiar. 

 

###

View Article  IABC Takes on "Advocacy"

One of the most encouraging initiatives to come from IABC in recent years is the current push to create an "advocacy agenda" for the world's largest association of business communicators.

While much of what IABC has done in the recent past has been top-down and association-centric (and thus of little street-level impact for those of us in the trenches), I've been very encouraged in my conversations with Michael Zimet, who is heading up this current initiative. 

Michael is quite keen that alternative approaches, including "bottom-up" initiatives, networking activities that cross IABC's organizational boundaries, and even shifts in IABC's overall approach and orientation get aired, discussed and considered.

As a lot of what CommsOffensive325 is about involves challenging the status quo in the profession, IABC's ouverture provides an opportunity to make a difference quickly and perhaps even fundamentally. 

The "advocacy" conversation is taking place at:  http://commons.iabc.com/advocacy/

View Article  CommsOffensive325 "Engages Engagement"
In its January 25th edition, CommsOffensive325 takes a hard look at the internal communications industry's enthusiasm for "Employee Engagement", raises a challenge to practitioners to consider alternative models and definitions of engagement, and mounts a frontal assault on "One Size Fits All" (OSFA) "Engagement" approaches.   more »
View Article  An Alternative View: Four Forms of Engagement
A view of "Engagement" that focuses on four naturally occuring forms of engagement that exist in organizations, and presents a frontal assault on "Engagement" as a one-size-fits-all desired solution.   more »
View Article  Questioning "Engagement"
A number of things communicators should think about before embarking into the challenging realm of "Engagement"   more »
View Article  Join The Offensive
More about CommsOffensive325: What it's about, how to join   more »
View Article  January 3: "Why Internal Comms is Different" and the “Pentagon Model”
Why internal comms is really different from other communications disciplines, and an introduction to the "Pentagon Model" for evaluating internal communication challenges   more »
View Article  The CommsOffensive Begins
The CommsOffensive begins: giving internal communicators ammunition in the battle with clients and superiors who don't understand what we do.   more »